Helen Frowe

Helen Frowe. Introduction. The principle of non-combatant immunity holds that it is impermissible to target non- combatants in war. The principle is thought

Helen Frowe, The Limited Use View of the Duty to Save In: Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy Volume 7. Edited by: David Sobel, Peter Vallentyne, and

277 - 290 and Helen Frowe, Defensive Killing: An Essay on War and Self-Defence (manuscript in progress 2 As I discuss in Section III below, my account of

Helen Frowe deserves to be praised for making philosophy acces- sible, relevant and exciting. Next time I teach a course on just war theory, this is the

Adil Ahmad Haque argues that civilians who contribute to unjust lethal threats in war, but who do not directly participate in the war, are not liable to

Helen Frowe. This article explores how agreements to preferentially save can ground an excep- tion to the duty to minimize harm when saving. A rescuer

3 Helen Frowe, Defensive Killing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014 pp. 21–87. Her defini- tion of an innocent threat is on p. 21. Page 3. 653

Non-consequentialist orthodoxy holds that, most of the time, lesser-evil justifications add to agents' permissible options without taking any away. Helen Frowe

Our thanks go to Helen Frowe and Derek Matravers for their thoughtful and forcefully argued contribution. James Cuno. President and CEO. J. Paul Getty Trust

Helen Frowe. The Ethics of War and Peace: An Introduction (Abingdon: Routledge 2011 244 pp. ISBN: 9780415492409 (pbk Hardback/Paperback: £70.00/17.99

507 – 537, Helen Frowe, „Equating Innocent Threats and Bystanders Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 277 – 290, and Helen Frowe, Defensive

This belief is so widely held that we will refer to it as non-consequentialist orthodoxy. In a recent article, Helen Frowe challenges this orthodoxy.2 She

6 (2005 711–49; Jonathan Quong, “Liability to Defensive Harm Philoso- phy and Public Affairs 40 (2012 45–77; Helen Frowe, Defensive Killing (Oxford: OUP

The objectivist, on the one. HELEN FROWE. Page 5. hand, will not allow Victim to kill Incompetent Murderer, despite the fact that Victim cannot distinguish

How do these thoughts about claims and duties play out in a case such as Day's End? Page 2. II—HELEN FROWE. 268. ©2015 The Aristotelian

and sharing of intimate images without consent in the Criminal Justice Bill, Dr Jonathan. Parry (LSE) and Prof Helen Frowe (University of Stockholm) argue that

Helen Frowe has argued that field medics are not permitted to treat reactivated combatants but is silent about deactivated ones. First, I argue that FroweLs

Daniel Brunstetter , 'Jus ad vim: a rejoinder to Helen Frowe Ethics and International Affairs 30: 1, 2016, pp. 131–6. 40 Shue, 'Laws of war p. 275. 41

Written evidence submitted by Professor Helen Frowe and Dr. Jonathan Parry. Non-contact Sexual Offences Inquiry – Intimate Image Abuse. We are writing to

Helen Frowe (Stockholm University Chair: Kida Lin (University of Oxford Granary 1. The Other Resource Curse: Commodities, Market Volatility, and the Least